Jump to content

User talk:AFBorchert

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 12 hours ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion (02 October 2026)
Molas Pass in the Rocky Mountains


Comments, suggestions, and questions are welcome. Please open new sections here. This talk page is automatically archived by ArchiverBot. Any sections older than 14 days with at least one signature end up in the archives.

Please do not send unblock requests to me by email. Just use the {{Unblock}} template instead for this.


Kommentare, Anregungen und Fragen sind herzlich willkommen. Bitte neue Abschnitte unten anfügen. Diese Diskussionsseite wird von ArchiverBot automatisch archiviert. Alle Abschnitte, die 14 Tage alt sind und mindestens eine Signatur haben, landen im Archiv.

Ich bitte darum, keine Anträge auf Entsperrungen zu mir per E-Mail zu senden. Stattdessen ist von der {{Unblock}}-Vorlage Gebrauch zu machen.

Quality Image Promotion (21 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Nef – Chaire à prêcher 2026 08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:49, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (22 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Orgue de tribune 2026 08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:25, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Nef II 2026 08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and beutiful composition. --ArildV 06:25, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (23 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Nef 2026 08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good picture, ut a new cut is needed because of the white lower corners. --Lmbuga 23:53, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Lmbuga: Thanks, has been fixed now. --AFBorchert 07:05, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. Thank you. --Lmbuga 18:56, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (24 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 220 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:55, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 218 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Dina Panayotis 17:52, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 214 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rabbi Mendl 13:02, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 216 – Vitrail d'Adam et Ève 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 19 – Vitrail de la Cananéenne 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (25 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 223 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rabbi Mendl 15:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 224 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tess Mattew 12:04, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 222 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tess Mattew 12:05, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 25 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (26 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 217 – Adoration des mages 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor Tkachiov 21:06, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 221 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:36, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (27 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 17 - femme aux serpents ailés (représentation de la luxure) 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:57, 25 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 33 - chapiteau à décor d'oiseaux affrontés 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:11, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Voûte 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rabbi Mendl 18:51, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Déambulatoire – Chapelle de la Vierge 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 18:30, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Choeur – Baldaquin 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Avesome --Rabbi Mendl 12:35, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayonne – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 215 2026 08 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rabbi Mendl 12:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Bas-côté nord – Dalle funéraire 2026 08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think it’s a good photo, but there are about three specks of light that I don’t think are acceptable. The first one, which is green, is at the top centre of the wooden door. To the right there’s another one, which is white. A little further down there’s a red one. It’s not that they’re particularly important, but they’re so easy to sort out that…--Lmbuga 12:51, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Lmbuga for pointing this out. I've fixed this and uploaded the fixed version. Unfortunately I run into the problem described at T425216 which causes some of the proxy servers to serve still the wrong version. As of now, in Europe I get the wrong version and in NYC I get the correct version. All thumbnail versions are correct. Purge doesn't help here, local browser caches are not the problem. This is a serious Wikimedia server issue the developers are working on right now. --AFBorchert 15:13, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. Thank you --Lmbuga 14:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion: Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Nef II 2026 08 05

[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Nef II 2026 08 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chalon-sur-Saône – Cathédrale Saint-Vincent – Nef II 2026 08 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

It passed with 10 support votes and none against, and it is now listed at Religious buildings › France. /Wilfredor (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (28 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 19 – Le pèsement des âmes 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:57, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 34 – Arrestation du Christ 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:36, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 35 – Remise des clés à saint Pierre 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:12, 25 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 37 - acrobate 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (29 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 10 – Animaux fabuleux picorant une fleur II 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rabbi Mendl 17:45, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Chapiteau nº 10 – Animaux fabuleux picorant une fleur 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:30, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Console nº 47 – Deux têtes masculines 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:15, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Console nº 49 – Deux hommes agenouillés, en position d'atlantes 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:45, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brive-la-Gaillarde – Collégiale Saint-Martin – Console nº 48 – Personnage à quattre-pattes 2026 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:25, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (30 September 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kildallon Christ Church Interior II 2026 08 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunfanaghy Holy Trinity Church Interior 2026 08 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:33, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Rabbi Mendl 18:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kildallon Christ Church East Window W01 Angel and Women at the Tomb 2026 08 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:52, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 09:52, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kildallon Christ Church Interior 2026 08 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:49, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (01 October 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kildallon Christ Church Transept 2026 08 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (02 October 2026)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oviedo – Catedral de San Salvador – Galeria nord del claustre 2026 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:33, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply