Commons:Deletion requests/Two Klashorst images
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Two Klashorst images
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
I'm a friend of this girl's mother. She wants this picture to be removed. You can contact me on: (email address removed by mattbuck - admins may view it in deleted revisions of Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Expirimental.jpg) --Wikibert (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=parser&utm_content=thumbnail)
Comment - I'd like to point out that as part of attempting to get these deleted Wikibert vandalised the images and their description pages. Both images have previously been kept - Commons:Deletion requests/File:Expirimental.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Werkpauze (photo by Peter Klashorst).jpg. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)- This should not be handled through the DR process. The person involved should contact OTRS (or they should contact him). -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 20:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comment before we start any discussion we need to know if the claim is real. Have the mother send an email to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org Multichill (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2010 (UTC) - CommentI'm sorry for vandalising the images, however you were able to revert this. OTRS is now informed. I will inform the mother, so she can send an email to OTRS. I want to point out that it wasn't my intention to vandalise any page here, sorry. --Wikibert (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- 2010072410030588. Multichill (talk) 20:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- how does that ticket-thing work? --Wikibert (talk) 21:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Your communications with OTRS are tracked in a secure database accessible to only a few trusted individuals. They are tracked under a database or ticket number. You won't be able to access OTRS but if you email them in the future and reference that number they will compile it together. Once they are satisfied of your bona fides, and if they agree to the deletion reason, the image will be deleted. Claims of privacy such as yours are much better handled through that process. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 22:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't feel like handling this ticket. Given the mother would mail, would we delete the file, no matter the given reason?--DieBuche (talk) 09:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- I see no reason why not. Yes, the images are widely used, but we should extend good faith towards the mother of the child. — Huntster (t @ c) 11:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't feel like handling this ticket. Given the mother would mail, would we delete the file, no matter the given reason?--DieBuche (talk) 09:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Your communications with OTRS are tracked in a secure database accessible to only a few trusted individuals. They are tracked under a database or ticket number. You won't be able to access OTRS but if you email them in the future and reference that number they will compile it together. Once they are satisfied of your bona fides, and if they agree to the deletion reason, the image will be deleted. Claims of privacy such as yours are much better handled through that process. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 22:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- how does that ticket-thing work? --Wikibert (talk) 21:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- 2010072410030588. Multichill (talk) 20:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep I don't understand. The child is not identified in any way, even by country. The files do not even say that she is a girl -- that came from Wikiherbert, and the categories have it wrong. She is now two years older, so certainly looks very different today from the images here. We have an unknown person asking for deletion of a widely used image -- OTRS does nothing to confirm this person's relationship to them. So why are we letting this person dictate what we do with apparently validly licensed images that are in wide use? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)- +1 keep i support the argumentation of jim Bunnyfrosch (talk) 17:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep We haven't even got a mail by the mother and the reasoning in the other ticket isn't really convincing--DieBuche (talk) 15:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Closed as keep through lack of further action or evidence. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:52, 21 August 2010 (UTC)