Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ebony Modi.jpg
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
does not meet project scope, see also COM:PEOPLE smial (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Before you nominate anything else, please clarify what you mean by "see also COM:PEOPLE". /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete Wichsvorlage, kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --ST ○ 00:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)- Delete kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --Ra Boe (talk) 01:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=parser&utm_content=thumbnail)
Comment - work by a notable artist, therefore within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep Vague notability. Not identifiable. Megapixie (talk) 13:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)- Delete No educational or encyclopedic value --KS aus F (talk) 14:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Work by notable photographer so seems likely to have an educational value and as a photographer I would expect anyone who poses for him to not have any expectation of privacy so I don't consider this image to be an unreasonable intrusion. It doesn't appear that the individual is identifiable anyway. Adambro (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep not identifiable. & work by artist + illustration of black female genitalia therefore in the scope. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Good, high quality image. Person is not identify. No reason for deletion.--Avril1975 (talk) 22:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep doesn't look like the work of a Paparazzi to me. It's a work of art under a free license, even by a notable creator. --Yamavu (talk) 20:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep As for as I can tell COM:PEOPLE is about identifiable people. Can anyone please tell me where you can see an identifiable person on this picture??? Because I can't.--Lamilli (talk) 22:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Possible educational and encyclopedic value for human female figure/body. I have no objection. Raeky (talk) 19:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep A high quality image by a notable artist, unidentifiable subject. Prolog (talk) 02:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Kept. work by a notable artist, therefore within scope Abigor talk 05:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
