Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dress (Klashorst).jpg
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=1){kind=link}
kein model release, persönlichkeitsrechte verletzt, keine enzyklopädische verwendung smial (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Smial-2009-01-25T22:41:00.000Z-File:Dress_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
Keep - tagged with personality rights, I don't see the issue here. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Mattbuck-2009-01-25T23:04:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T22:41:00.000Z){kind=link}
Delete ich würde sagen nein, bei Gesichtern muß eine deutlich Zustimmung erfolgen. Tschüß --Ra Boe (talk) 23:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z-File:Dress_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete COM:PEOPLE --Eva K. is evil 23:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- DeleteObviously a private setting, so there must be a model release to keep it. Guy, check out what kind of technically poor, juridically, politically, and ethically dubios photo without any enyclopedical use you are supporting here by what? Pretending "anti-censorship"? --Martina Nolte (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Wichsvorlage, kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --ST ○ 00:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PEOPLE Why again? --KS aus F (talk) 00:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Personality rights are not an issue. Megapixie (talk) 13:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Work by notable photographer so seems likely to have an educational value and as a photographer I would expect anyone who poses for him to not have any expectation of privacy so I don't consider this image to be an unreasonable intrusion. The personality rights tag seems more than enough. Adambro (talk) 14:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The COM:PEOPLE argument is irrelevant here. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep A high quality image by a notable artist, and the image page already has the personality rights tag. Prolog (talk) 09:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-EvaK-2009-01-25T23:46:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Martina_Nolte-2009-01-25T23:58:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Steschke-2009-01-26T00:26:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-KS_aus_F-2009-01-26T00:28:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Megapixie-2009-01-26T13:02:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Adambro-2009-01-26T14:40:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-TwoWings-2009-01-29T18:29:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Prolog-2009-01-31T09:35:00.000Z-Raboe001-2009-01-25T23:43:00.000Z){kind=link}
Kept. Neutral backgound, which is not dissimilar to many portraits we have here. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-MichaelMaggs-2009-05-11T18:07:00.000Z-File:Dress_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&oldid=418538144){kind=link}