Commons:Deletion requests/File:Can you lick it ! (Klashorst).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=1){kind=link}
does not meet project scope, see also com:people smial (talk) 23:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z-File:Can_you_lick_it_!_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
Delete Wichsvorlage, kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --ST ○ 00:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC).svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=parser&utm_content=thumbnail)
Comment - Work by notable artist so in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)- Delete kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --Ra Boe (talk) 01:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete As the artist got relevance on WP as painter this photo, like his others, is - prooved also by the non-professional setting and technique - his hobbyist photos. Or shall we now illustrate prominent persons with their dogs and paintings? --Martina Nolte (talk) 02:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment COM:PEOPLE has nothing to do with it, as that applies only to images of identifiable people. This is not identifiable. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No educational or encyclopedic value --KS aus F (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep Work by notable photographer so seems likely to have an educational value and as a photographer I would expect anyone who poses for him to not have any expectation of privacy so I don't consider this image to be an unreasonable intrusion. It doesn't appear that the individual is identifiable anyway. Adambro (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)- Keep not identifiable. & work by artist (who is also a photographer) + illustration of female genitalia + a sexual pratice (ice stimulation) therefore in the scope. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep As for as I can tell COM:PEOPLE is about identifiable people. Can anyone please tell me where you can see an identifiable person on this picture??? Because I can't.--Lamilli (talk) 22:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No encyclopedic or historic value. Just because it's the work of a "known" artist doesn't mean it has value to society in this image archive. Raeky (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Steschke-2009-01-26T00:30:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Mattbuck-2009-01-26T00:43:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Raboe001-2009-01-26T01:38:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Martina_Nolte-2009-01-26T02:54:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-MichaelMaggs-2009-01-26T08:09:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-KS_aus_F-2009-01-26T14:01:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Adambro-2009-01-26T14:48:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-TwoWings-2009-01-27T17:02:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Lamilli-2009-01-29T22:50:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Raeky-2009-01-30T19:46:00.000Z-Smial-2009-01-25T23:48:00.000Z){kind=link}
Kept. Kept 2 times before (see hereand no new or valid reasons given for deletion. So it has to be kept again. Author is notable artist, so it is in scope. ChristianBier (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg#c-ChristianBier-2009-01-30T21:05:00.000Z-File:Can_you_lick_it_!_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
Nude photo 203.17.70.161 03:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg#c-203.17.70.161-2011-06-10T03:00:00.000Z-File:Can_you_lick_it_!_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy Keep; nominator gives no reason to delete this file.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- not any censorship: Keep dontworry (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Prosfilaes-2011-06-10T03:05:00.000Z-203.17.70.161-2011-06-10T03:00:00.000Z){kind=link}
.jpg#c-Dontworry-2011-06-10T05:27:00.000Z-203.17.70.161-2011-06-10T03:00:00.000Z){kind=link}
Speedy kept - not a valid reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Mattbuck-2011-06-10T09:42:00.000Z-File:Can_you_lick_it_!_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
Seems to be just plain porno and completely outside the project scope. You can rub your genitals with anything; how is this special? 68.173.113.106 19:16, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg#c-68.173.113.106-2012-07-28T19:16:00.000Z-File:Can_you_lick_it_!_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
Kept as per every time before - like him or not, Klashorst is a notable artist, and thus his photos are within scope. Not saying they're special, but they are within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg#c-Mattbuck-2012-07-28T19:33:00.000Z-File:Can_you_lick_it_!_(Klashorst).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&oldid=75163334){kind=link}