Commons:Deletion requests/File:Black genitalia 2.jpg
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
does not meet project scope, see also com:people smial (talk) 23:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete Wichsvorlage, kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --ST ○ 00:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment - Work by notable artist so in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)- Delete Ich sehe keinen enzyklopädischer Grund ein schwarzen Hinterteil zu behalten oder wozu braucht man so ein Bild?? --Ra Boe (talk) 01:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Korrektur --Ra Boe (talk) 09:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No use here. --DaB. (talk) 01:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Was there a reason this was deleted outside of the normal deletion cycle ? Megapixie (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I haven't seen the image (which seems to have been prematurely deleted) but if the artist is notable (as mattbuck asserts above; I don't know the artist), wouldn't the image be worth keeping as an example of that artist's work, independently of how usable it is for any other purpose? - Jmabel ! talk 20:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Kept. (simply closing request) Kameraad Pjotr 12:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Unused; better alternatives exist. See COM:NUDE. Oneiros (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Keep Work by notable artist, so in scope. I do not know any real alternatives for that view. --178.39.34.160 23:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)- Keep - work by notable artist. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Really nice shot! Not all photos of this theme are that great. Good example for the ones who look for it. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 06:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Rare --Starscream (talk) 23:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept. --Leyo 15:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
This image has no pedagogical value whatsoever and should not be on Wikimedia. It has been deleted on flickr for what it is. Only the trolls governing Commons see a potential value in this image. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep as per my previous !votes: Klashorst is a notable artist. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Then you are a troll and you should be banned on Commons. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- To me, you seem to be the troll. You've renominated an image which at last DR was closed as a unanmimous keep, and are calling people who disagree with you trolls. You vandalised the image page, you did the same to this page a few weeks back, and are now nominating all the images you uploaded, which you released under an irrevocable licence, for deletion on the grounds that I love assholes. And it's true, I do love assholes, in fact I have a little pet theory that relationship compatability is proportional to the similarness of the taste of the two people's backsides. But that's beside the point. I'm sorry that this one image has soured your view of Commons, but I should point out that Commons, like other Wikimedia projects, may contain material that you consider to be offensive. What's more, there's a simple solution to it: don't look at it. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Then you are a troll and you should be banned on Commons. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep COM:NOTCENSORED. No reason for deletion given. --Saibo (Δ) 19:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Maybe no pedagogical but artistic. --Starscream (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep on the basis of whose work it is. Folks, not everything on here is going to be to your taste. That is your problem, not Commons'. I continue to be in favor of a way of reducing or eliminating the chance that someone encounters images of human genitalia when they are not looking for them, but I'm entirely opposed to eliminating such images from the Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 17:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Our photographic nudity tends to be white; this is an important exception.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:57, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid reason to delete. Please do not make personal attacks directed at fellow editors. Bidgee (talk) 04:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
