Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aphrodite (genitalia).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aphrodite_(genitalia).jpg

does not meet project scope, see also COM:PEOPLE smial (talk) 23:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Delete Wichsvorlage, kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --ST ○ 00:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Delete auch hier kein enzyklopädischer Hintergrund erkennbar. --Ra Boe (talk) 01:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment - work by a notable artist, therefore within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Not identifiable. Megapixie (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Delete Image gives no contribution to the project scope --KS aus F
•  Keep Work by notable photographer so seems likely to have an educational value and as a photographer I would expect anyone who poses for him to not have any expectation of privacy so I don't consider this image to be an unreasonable intrusion. It doesn't appear that the individual is identifiable anyway. Adambro (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep close-up so COM:PEOPLE doesn't apply. And it's in the scope as any good picture of female genitalia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 03:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Per Adambro & TwoWings... All pictures of known authors are valuable to keep and can be used to show history of art. Especially that we have no many photos with modern arts because of copyrigts. It is silly to get rid of that few which are free only because some people are obscurant...Electron (talk) 07:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Good, high quality image. Person is not identify. No reason for deletion.--Avril1975 (talk) 22:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep doesn't look like the work of a Paparazzi to me. It's a work of art under a free license, even by a notable creator. --Yamavu (talk) 20:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep As for as I can tell COM:PEOPLE is about identifiable people. Can anyone please tell me where you can see an identifiable person on this picture??? Because I can't.--Lamilli (talk) 22:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

---

Kept. per voters ChristianBier (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)